Facts you should know about Local Look Digital Summit Dallas

This research drew on a range of sources, including books, electronic journals, departmental papers, and World Wide Web sites. The initial search strategy yielded over a thousand results, but this was substantially reduced when the search strategy was adjusted to look for specific documents related to definition, origin, validity, form, measurement, and resolution. The following references were chosen for their authority, reach, currency, meaning, and objectivity. Only electronic journals were used, which were accessed via university databases that were recommended. In the field of information management, the terms “digital divide” and “digital divide” have become buzzwords.Do you want to learn more? click for more info

This paper discusses the literature on its meaning, as well as when and where it first appeared. It raises the question of whether it can be quantified, and if so, how each form can be calculated. At the local, national, and global levels, programmes and approaches to close the digital divide are examined. As world leaders make plans to bridge the divide, some observers question whether the divide really exists, while others disagree on what it is. According to Hongladarom (2003), some commentators suggest the word should be dropped entirely and replaced with the more optimistic term “social inclusion.” When the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released the study ‘Falling Through the Net’ in 1995, the term was first coined by the US government (Servon, 2002, p.2). The study reported that there is a digital divide in America, separating those who have access to information technology from those who do not. The digital divide, according to Cullen (2003), is “the difference that exists in most countries between those who have ready access to the tools, information and communication technologies (ICTs), and those who do not.” Servon (2002, p.2), on the other hand, claims that “the technology gap is just one link in a causal chain that has repeatedly tied some groups to disadvantage.” As a result, the digital divide is a symptom of a much larger and more complicated problem: persistent poverty and inequality.’

Related Post